When it comes to the truth about radiation and health effects,
there are no experts who are honest - not in government, not in science, not anywhere. Yet, people would rather
listen to liars than challenge their assumptions about the sources of the so-called truth and disregard the purveyors
of actual truth on this topic: the non-creditialed self-taught. - Andrew Kishner, May 18, 2013
'Deception, Cover-up and Murder in the Nuclear Age' is our six-year effort and free web-based book. Click to read the book here
What you can learn in the book: Every cancer and leukemia
since 1945 can be fractionally blamed on one thing: nuclear testing fallout. 'Chernobyl fallout' was 90-95% from Chernobyl and the rest from a covered-up U.S. nuclear release. There are dozens of nuclear reactors orbiting us - many have crashed on Earth. The U.S. may have replicated a 'Hiroshima' inferno on actual humans (in cages in Nevada). Your cremated remains mixed into water would be undrinkable per the EPA because of its strontium-90 levels.
MORE
April 30, 2013 - While LaScram
LaSalle Falls Apart, Operator Asks NRC If They Can Put a Hemi
In It- Exelon is proceeding with a formal request to the NRC for a mega-power boost (aka
'uprate') at the LaSalle plant to increase thermal output by a whopping 12.5%. Also, it has
been learned that the culprit of the technical shutdown of LaSalle Unit 1 reactor on
April 27th was the same exact valve that failed
following a scram in February 2011 due to a welding defect. The recommended fix (buy a new one, duh!) was apparently not heeded;
Status: LaSalle 1 is being restarted (at 22%). LaSalle 2 is at 1% power.
April 29, 2013 - Map of eastern U.S. nuclear plants that
have no containment vent filters (which is a 'Fukushima lessons learned'
that 'wasn't implemented')- enlarge image
April 25-27, 2013 - April 25: LaSalle Unit 2 restart attempt results in a
scram - reason: condenser leak. April 26: NRC
announces 'Special Investigation'
into April 17th events; April 27: during Unit 1 startup process, operators
were forced to shut reactor down after leak was detected in the primary containment
April 17, 2013 - LaSalle County
Nuclear Generating Station is hit by lightning - both reactors scram - pressure
builds in containment - radioactive gases vented from containment - monitoring fails -
vents from Unit 2 not filtered - leaks and other problems not reported until days later - our initial report
and our analysis of the types of radioactive gases released
in unfiltered vent
Recent Writings:
Frying Dutchman say: 'Plutonium is far deadlier than other radioactive materials.
If you breath in even just a tiny amount, it attacks your cells and destroys their DNA so they can't reproduce.
That's the stuff that leaked out, but for a long time, those bastards never even mentioned plutonium.
They just kept repeating "There is no immediate health risk. There is no immediate health risk."'
Watch the video to learn who are the bastards and why we all are idiots:
'Such an attack would employ either nuclear weapons, resulting in global radiation fallout, or conventional bunker buster weaponry that would unleash harmful, radioactive uranium dust from Iran's facilities that would likewise circle the globe and endanger the lives of millions.'
2.) Learn for yourself (from very learned geologist-authors) about 'The Bunker Buster Fantasy' in the Appendix section of a really great and credible book (link is to good excerpt via Google Books)
3.) Even if we bomb Iran, this is a news broadcast you won't be hearing. Why?
Because the public health consequences of leaked radiation from an attack on an Iranian nuclear facility
aren't being truthful reported now and they certainly won't be mentioned by the news media
or intergovernmental bodies - like the IAEA - after a hypothetical attack. Listen
to this 'must-hear' [BEWARE: THIS IS A MADE-UP BROADCAST, IT DIDN'T HAPPEN (YET)] fictional broadcast of 'breaking news of an attack' that references
the canceled Divine Strake test.
4.) Learn more about bunker buster wishful thinking on our Facebook page
Our writings on NASA's Curiosity launch
Curiosity Diary: Launch Day Minus 1 (November 25, 2011): 12:22PM
During the late 1950s and early 1960s, Nobel laureates, scientific organizations and worldwide citizen and peace groups managed to convince the U.S. and U.S.S.R. to stop open-air nuclear bomb testing because it was leading to the incorporation of lethal amounts of strontium-90 in the bones and teeth of the young. One reason - which is the one that's widely accepted - why the superpowers succumbed to global opposition to their atmospheric nuclear tests was that they knew more testing was going to lead to a global medical crisis. But another reason, and one that is little known, is that after secretly studying the alternative - to continue testing while also 'denuding' strontium-90 from the upper atmosphere (where it resided for a short time after nuclear detonations) - and failing to find a workable solution, there was no choice by the superpowers but to agree to a ban on the most damaging types of nuclear tests.
Nowadays, scientists and citizen groups are protesting the contamination of Earth's air with unnatural quantities of a chemical called 'carbon dioxide,' which is leading to runaway climate change. The leaders of the industrial nations of the world will, predictably, have no choice in the end but to succumb to citizen's entreaties when they (secretly) realize - from the reports submitted by scientists - that there is no way to continue with the status quo and at the same time remove all of that excessive carbon dioxide before a great 'tipping point' is reached.
While for climate change it is too early in the game to fully know if we had a 'close call' or we acted too late and are screwed, I am convinced that the lingering effects (even despite the test bans) of nuclear testing fallout on global public health did 'screw us' - I think that fallout really caused our present-day global cancer epidemic. We acted too late and did great damage to our ecology and to future generations. Over-manipulation of our scientific knowledgebase by governmental interference has prevented most people from realizing this.
Sadly, the failure of people to imagine what human-induced climate change could look like in 20 or 100 years, or see that we have caused a true catastrophe from the global contamination of our atmosphere with radioactive chemicals that were impossible to remove, is what is keeping us from preventing a second, third, or fourth, catastrophe.
In less than 24 hours the National Aeronautics and Space Administration plans to launch a rocket from Cape Canaveral. Its payload is a Mars rover that is powered by plutonium-238. Should the rocket and the rover - called 'Mars Science Laboratory' or 'Curiosity' - fail to leave Earth orbit, reenter the atmosphere and burn up, the fiery event could cause over 10 pounds of plutonium-238 to enter the upper atmosphere.
NASA thinks its safeguards and layers of shielding around the nuclear fuel will make it unlikely that a reentry will turn the plutonium-238 into an aerosolized form. Yet NASA admits there is a slim chance that aerosolization from burnup could occur. If that happens, it will be irreversible. There will be no way to de-nude the atmosphere of this plutonium 238 isotope, which will be present in our air for a period of 20-30 years in double the total amounts that were emitted into the atmosphere from all previous human activities, including nuclear reactor meltdowns and nuclear testing. I don't know - and I don't think anyone knows - how many lung cancers would be caused by the descent into millions of human lung cavities of 10 pounds of aerosolized plutonium-238. An environmental disaster of this magnitude has never happened before.
If in 10 years the signs of a global lung cancer crisis start showing because NASA's plutonium load burned up and infiltrated the atmosphere, it will be another repeat of the above case histories. People will plead for NASA to stop the nuclear space missions and only after realizing that the health crisis is real and atmospheric plutonium dust can't be removed, the space agency will finally give in and go 100% solar. But do we want that to be a possible scenario of our future? In less than 24 hours, if we could, and we did stop NASA, that possibility would be removed from our future; we wouldn't have to face a future of irreversible contamination of the air with harmful amounts of plutonium chemicals that risk global public health. If NASA didn't launch this plutonium fueled rover, we would be guaranteed a 0% chance of a catastrophe.
But we had more than 24 months to stop NASA and no movement grew strong enough to even make even a noticeable protest.
When will we admit to ourselves the truth, that we have blundered so greatly with our technologies that we ought to be much more careful in the future, perhaps to the point of techno-skepticism, perhaps to the point of doubting the military and all industries, perhaps even to the point of attaching substantial fear to this thing called 'pollution'?
NASA'S LACKLUSTER RADIATION MONITORING ON EARTH - November 22, 2011 - In 2011, during a launch window that begins on
Nov. 26 and extends to mid-December, NASA plans to launch a rocket carrying the
Mars Science Laboratory, aka 'Curiosity,' from Florida.
One of the
automated scientific devices on the plutonium-powered Mars rover is an alpha ray
spectrometer, which is a laboratory device that can aid in identifying the distinct
alpha
ray-emitting radioisotopes in the environment. Alpha particles come in two
types: natural (i.e.,
radon, uranium) and artificial (i.e., plutonium) forms, however Curiosity's
spectrometer will be used to learn about levels and types of natural alpha radiation on Mars'
surface.
In contrast to the sophistication of radiation
equipment on Curiosity intended for use on Mars, NASA appears to have no tools in place for quickly identifying
the presence of plutonium 238 dust in the case of a launch accident on
Earth. Should an accident occur during one of the early
phases of NASA's rocket launch and disperse plutonium dust into the local
environment, the greatest danger to Floridians will be breathing plutonium dust in the hours after the accident.
However, NASA has only announced it will have a
'monitoring' network in Florida equipped with weather instruments that can track a plume in
the atmosphere. If NASA was taking public safety seriously, it would array
literally hundreds of alpha counters (which can count the 'clicks' of alpha
decay), alpha
ray spectrometers and high volume air samplers within and beyond the 'Space Coast' in
Florida. These three tools - if present in hundreds of locations - would enable the
agency to firstly learn about high 'alpha counts' in a city or town when it
happens and instantly identify the type of isotope through the 'alpha spec' -
this would be the catalyst for quickly retrieving air filters and rendering
laboratory analyses to determine the levels of plutonium-238 in a city or town's
air.
Even more concerning, most people on Earth could
be exposed to inhalable plutonium particles over a 10-20 year period in case of
a (low probability) low-earth orbit 'burn-up' of the rocket, yet NASA has not
announced any plans for high altitude monitoring to determine the presence of plutonium
dust in the upper and lower layers of the atmosphere to predict global
deposition patterns and then global ground-level monitoring to track deposition onto Earth's
surface, which will occur primarily during 'rainouts.' (return to 'Nuclear Rockets and Spacecraft')
Public Comment by Ace Hoffman published in NASA's MSL (Curiosity) Final EIS *which was enabled with password protected security features that prevent search engines from picking up the text*:
September 29th, 2006
Dear Chris Kridler,
NASA announced that meeting, as far as I know, about two days before it occurred, so no wonder people like me (who lives about 3,000 miles away) didn't happen to be there.
NASA's RTG's are incredibly dangerous. They twist their accidents into successes, when in fact, the plutonium they have already released has killed, and continues to kill, human beings throughout the planet.
One estimate I heard is that as many as a million people could be condemned to die, or have died already, from ONE previous NASA Pu failure (Gofman). Another estimate, by a pro-nuker, is that males in the Northern Hemisphere piss out about a million atoms of Pu every day from that one accident. NASA misunderstands totally, the dangers of the radioactive aerosol fumes their accidents create.
And sure, they now have containments for the Pu, they didn't used to. But these containments are paper-thin and not really all that good. There are numerous accident scenarios where they will breach. Furthermore they reduce the efficiency of the devices, requiring carrying MORE Pu for the same mission! So an accident with, say, a 10% release of 25 pounds (total) of Pu can be as bad as a full release of a much smaller quantity of Pu, which was delivering the exact same electrical output! (The release amount in the 1964 accident was 2.1 pounds.)
No one at NASA cares to truly understand the dangers of low level radiation, or to accept their (NASA's) true accident rates. Anyone in the organization who does grasp the truth is ostracized and outed as soon as possible. Question the faith that LLR might not even be good for you ("Hormesis," the fallacy that LLR has beneficial side-effects) and you will never even get in, let alone, advance, in today's nuclear NASA.
These people are part of a closed society of dangerous, closed-mined "scientists" who are hoodwinking the American public and who are guilty of premeditated random murder, infanticide, and even genocide.
The media has a duty to learn the truth rather than parrot NASA's blanketly-flase assertions such as "the risk from the mission would be low." As NASA looks for life on Mars, they don't just "risk" life on Earth. They condemn it, because as surely as day follows night, accidents happen when dangerous activities are repeated ad nauseam.
Sincerely,
"Ace" Hoffman
Carlsbad, CA
NASA's Plutonium Gamble is no Joke
Did you hear about NASA Hair Gel for Men? It's so strong it can tame even a wild mustang, but beware: it might blow up and spread plutonium all over the place.
Maybe you also heard about the NASA Deluxe Coffee Maker. It brews 10 cups in 10 seconds but also could blow up and send plutonium all over your kitchen.
No one in their right mind would spend their money on any of these fictitious items so why did American taxpayers foot the $2.5 billion bill for the Mars Science Laboratory aka 'Curiosity', the name of NASA's biggest yet (plutonium-powered) rover whose Mars-bound rocket could fail after the post-Thanksgiving Day launch and release plutonium into the Earth's air? Perhaps we 'bought' this latest nuclear gizmo because we still can't accept that it isn't in our best interests to trust corporations and governments, especially when they assure us about the safety of nuclear powered technologies. For example, they said it couldn't happen but Fukushima happened, right? And then when an accident like Fukushima happens they will say that cesium-contaminated pollen or rice or plutonium dust is harmless, implying the mindboggling equation: radioactive particles plus clean air still equals clean air! Since before most of us were born the scientific consensus has been that there is no safe dose of radiation, why do we let our goverments, and the corporations they're supposed to police, lie to us with such distortions of math and logic? Like corporations do to protect the image of their product lines to keep us buying, governments lie, cover up and twist logic to convince us to subsidize with our taxes (and our health) their nuclear gizmos that have the potential to - and have more than once - spread plutonium all over the place. The biggest U.S. accident involving nuclear power in space (in 1964) spread 2.1 pounds of plutonium across the globe. This one threatens to disperse 10.56 pounds of it. Please act to stop this launch - learn how by following our Facebook page.
Visit our Youtube channel and 'Friends' page at Facebook
Nuclearcrimes.org/Idealist's analysis on Fukushima is now on-line, however it is still in draft-form, and our conclusion is still that Japan is fucked, and her residents should get the hell out of there and they should not believe *any* person, entity or resource that argues, implies or suggests that any amount of radiation exposure is safe or harmless.
Radiation standards are propaganda tools developed by nuclear powers to basically convince ordinary people like you that nothing deleterious will happen if their deliberately or accidentally leaked radioactive waste from their nuclear activities enters your body. Sadly, global peoples, especially the Japanese people, have a long history of swallowing both radiochemical forms of fallout and force-fed-lies about 'safe levels' of radioactive substances in their environment, their tap water, their wheat, their milk, their diet, their bones, etc.... There should be ZERO levels of cesium-137 and strontium-90 and plutonium in the environment. These substances are FAR more dangerous to human health than any other substances known in the universe.
Our philosophy for social change: The institutions of our democracy and civilization regrettably cannot be trusted when it comes to many important issues nowadays, and especially the issue of nuclear radiation. Fukushima is the most recent case study in this regard. What is the common man and woman to do? Simply put: stewardship of human societies is self-stewardship writ large. Without impressive individuals we cannot have impressive societies and so the only act that will ensure the betterment of all is the betterment of each self. Unfortunately, that is always the last thing anyone thinks of when considering global problems.
Unbelievable and Believable Quotes:
"I am on record in 1957 as NOT being worried yet about fallout and stil being optimistic about the benefits of nuclear power.
There is no way I can justify my failure to help sound an alarm over these activities many years sooner than I did.
I feel that at least several hundred scientists trained in the biomedical aspect of atomic energy - myself definitely included - are candidates for Nuremberg-type trials for crimes against humanity through our gross negligence and irresponsibility.
Now that we know the hazard of low-dose radiation, the crime is not experimentation - it's murder."
- John Gofman, 'An Irreverent, Illustrated View of Nuclear Power'
"To
be blunt, there is absolutely no way we can maintain a credible
deterrent and reduce the number of weapons in our stockpile without
either resorting to testing our stockpile or pursuing a modernization
program." - Defense Secretary Robert Gates, 10/28/08
U.S. Declaration of Independence: "...That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness...when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
'At
the most fundamental of levels, the struggle to address the radioactive legacy
of the Cold War has been a struggle over who has the right and power to shape,
access, and use information. People seek access to information that depicts
"the whole truth" about the nuclear war machine and its human health
effects. And governments seek to control or remove from public access such
information. They do so because this information demonstrates past harm and
present or future risk, and thus demonstrates liability and supports demands for
accountability.' - Barbara Rose Johnston (in 'Half Lives, Half Truths,'
2007)
'That
radioactive elements created by us are found in nature is an astounding event in
the history of the earth and of the human race. To fail to consider its
importance and its consequences would be a folly for which humanity would have
to pay a terrible price.' - Albert Schweitzer
Nations of
the world exploded 'some 504 nuclear weapons in the atmosphere at thirteen primary sites..' -
'Half Lifes, Half Truths'
'a kind
of secret low-intensity radioactive warfare has been waged against
unsuspecting populations' - 'Nuclear Wastelands'
A U.S. government health
study released in 2002 stated: "Any person living in the
contiguous United States since 1951 has been exposed to
radioactive fallout and all organs and tissues of the body have
received some radiation exposure."
Corporate
HonorLESS Roll
Quaker
Oats poisoned "science club" kids at Fernald State
School with radioactive milk and cereal - "Finish all your
milk."
Chrysler
did Uranium-235 separation (diffusion) for the federal government's
Manhattan Project in Detroit (the 'Project' built the bombs that
poisoned New Mexicans and killed 100,000s of Japanese)
Coors
- mysteriously stored drums of radioactive materials at a Colorado
facility
Hershey -
produced barriers for gaseous diffusion (for uranium enrichment) at
its Hondaille, Ill. plant; failed to divert Pennsylvania milk supplies
- tainted by TMI accident - from entering chocolate products
DuPont
(E.I. du Pont de Nemours) - 'director' of early Hanford
through 1946, incl. irradiation of uranium to produce plutonium for
Hiroshima bomb; built and ran Savannah River plant
General
Electric - built reactors at and directed Hanford from
1945-1965; waste tanks polluted Columbia River and northwest coast
with radiation; failed to whistle-blow 1949 'Green Run'; supports use
of and produced RTGs
Lockheed
Martin - supports use of and produces RTGs
Westinghouse
- built reactors at federal facility at Argonne, Ill.; also managed
Hanford; waste tanks polluted Columbia River and northwest coast with
radiation
Food
irradiating companies - turning our food into 'free radical' food;
splashes and spills get Cesium-137 atoms into food supply
Union Carbide
- ran Oak Ridge labs
Northrop
Grumman - manager of consortium running the former Nevada Test
Site - N2S2 - and has failed to
whistle-blow dangerous routine radioactive leaks into populated areas
and is liable for role in dirty-bomb experiment attempt, 'Divine
Strake'
Bechtel -
managed Nevada Test Site during underground nuclear testing years,
failed to whistle-blow radiation leaks to public
Pan
American World Airways (and other airlines), Aerojet, McDonald Douglas, Westinghouse -
played a role in research and development of nuclear-rocket technology
at the Nevada Test Site. Live tests released 10,000s of Curies of
Iodine-131 that traveled as far as northern Idaho, Colorado, Los
Angeles, and New Mexico.
Walt
Disney (Disney) - creator of Our Friend The Atom
(1957), a book and movie about atomic energy, for 'educational
purposes'
Eastman Kodak
Company (and other photographic film manufacturers) - never once
warned the public during the 1950s about fallout they knew was headed
to populated areas; never shared maps and forecasts they exclusively
obtained through a secret agreement with the A.E.C.
Unbelievable
exposures (to specific organs) in the 1950's:
Fluoroscopic
exam: 10-20 Rem/minute
Cinefluorography:
25 Rem/exam
Dental
full-mouth X-ray series: 10-150 Rem
Shoe-store
fluoroscopy: 50-150 Rem/min to feet
Radium-dial
watch: 7 Rem/yr
Half-value distances
air
tissue
x-rays1
40m
5cm
gamma2
200m
10cm
neutrons
40m
10cm
alpha3
3.6cm
(max)
0.0003cm
(max)
beta
10cm
(max)
1cm
(max)
1100keV
2 5MeV
3 Only
alphas possess linear energy - they don't 'zig zag' like other energy
types (betas zig-zag a lot and gammas deflect easily)
HTML tips three dots: ...
Apostrophe: '
dash: –
The latest nuclear test was a Z Machine plutonium shot held in New Mexico on March 31, 2011. The previous two nuclear tests were Barolo A and Barolo B, conducted on Dec. 1, 2010, and Feb. 2, 2011.
Diligent Anti-nuclear Activism - Dealing with Distrust and Deceit
The DOE, as with the entire federal government, the scientific community and
most within American society, expects us to believe that it (the DOE) will be
honest about the environmental impacts of proposed actions in all its NEPA
documents and not 'cherry pick,' withhold or 'make up' data or distort the truth
in order to suit its agenda. But the DOE and its predecessor have lied to
the public time and time again surrounding radiological exposures suffered by
downwinders, nuclear test site workers, atomic veterans, etc...The DOE is still
putting out environmental reports that are questionable - consider the last of
three Environmental Assessments for Divine Strake that included isotopic
analysis of 26 samples in an area exceeding a staggering 3 million square feet
that would have been disturbed by the Divine Strake blast and shock wave. The
soil sampling was the equivalent to taking one soil test per football field and
could have easily missed 'hot spots' of high concentrations of plutonium,
americium and other deadly radionuclides. The sampling also did not explore what
was below (more than 6") the ground of the site where the Divine Strake
blast would have occurred. This was of concern because the 700 tons of
ammonium-nitrate fuel-oil used for 'Divine Strake' would have been detonated in
a 36-foot deep hole and the blast - equivalent to a 0.6 kiloton TNT explosion -
would have forcefully ejected all of the dirt around the pit.
Since Divine Strake was cancelled in early 2007, the DOE has continued
hosting - and has agreed to boost the frequency, yield and numbers of locations
for - a Pentagon program of surface explosive tests at the NNSS that are a
fraction the size of Divine Strake, yet these tests are capable of disturbing
surface contamination. So, why is there is no publicly-made environmental data
and why is the DOE getting away with exploiting a NEPA process called
'categorical exclusion' to green-light these tests? Read more about stopping
Divine Strakes.
Based on this and other revelations of DOE deceit, I believe all of the DOE's
pronouncements are questionable.
What do we do? How do we move forward when there are no trustworthy
assessments of government actions that carry very real negative public health
consequences?
The answer lies in getting citizens to become active in
holding accountable the nuclear weapons complex of its past, present and future
releases of radioactive pollution through citizen-based monitoring, reporting,
investigations, legal action, and watchdogging.
----------------------
WHO IS A VICTIM OF THE ATOMIC BOMB?
Is an atomic bomb victim one who was in a city attacked by an atom bomb? Or is it one whose city was attacked with fallout?
Could it be both?
The question should not be 'Who is a Victim of the Atomic Bomb' but rather the question should be: 'WHO ISN'T AN ATOMIC BOMB VICTIM?'
Sankichi Toge was a survivor of
Hiroshima. His poems 'August 6th' and 'At the First-Aid Station,'
excerpted below, help us imagine the horror of the world unleashed on August
6th, 1945:
'How could I ever forget that flash
of light!'
'Buildings split, bridges collapsed'
'The fire-flood shifted on.'
'murky, quivering flames'
'burning, festering Hiroshima'
'skin dangling like rags'
'Limbs twitching, oozing blood and
foul secretions'
'Eyes all puffed-up slits of
white'
'spilt brains'
'Pot-bellied, one-eyed with half
their skin peeled off, bald'
'Heaps, God knew who they were....'
Several years ago a group called
Mohave Downwinders solicited letters from members of a rural Arizona county as
part of an attempt to expand a federal program to compensate radiation
victims. The locals wrote about the radiation injuries they suffered or
witnessed in their families that they believed were linked to low and medium
level fallout from Nevada nuclear bomb tests. Here are some excerpts:
'They opened him up, and the sewed
him back up and sent him home. They said their was nothing that they could do.
So we watched our father shrink up to nothing'
'At the time my sister was ill,
several other young people were diagnosed with the same type of acute
leukemia. All died within several weeks of each other.'
'up until the time he was about
three, he had to have shots of whole blood about every three weeks... The
doctor said it was a form of childhood anemia/leukemia.'
'Many times he begged his daughter
to "go in the bedroom and get my gun" to take away the his pain and
devastating humiliation of his now wasted and nonfunctioning body.'
'She could not eat, or have a
desire to eat. The cancer starved her to death.'
'Out of the last four pregnancies,
I am the only one to live....Baby #2: Miscarried -... This baby was
missing a foot.'
'Our only daughter was born with
birth defects ...and died a few days after she was born'
'I also had two sisters that died
of brain tumors'
January
7, 2010 - Aided with stimulus money, the DOE is demolishing a key facility
at the Nevada Test Site used to test nuclear rockets during the Cold War).
Is the demolishment creating a radioactive-dust problem?
In Australia, major nuclear test
sites were blocked by a 100-mile radius security zone. Why don't we do the
same, to protect the public from lofting plutonium dust from the Nevada
Test Site? More
U.S. Nuclear Detonations from Japan to South Atlantic and everywhere in between -
