Are you a denier of Fukushima radiation in your seafood?
|
NuclearCrimes.org |
| Home | About | Fukushima Updates | 'Nuclear Crimes-The Book' (e-book, free & online) | Donate | Contact | +Nuked Humans | Cancer 2012 | U.S. reactor map |
|
Area 13 (Plutonium contamination of Utah)
In 1957-1958,
the Atomic Energy Commission (the predecessor agency to the Dept. of Energy)
conducted 33 plutonium dispersal experiments, also called
'safety experiments,' at and around the Nevada Test Site. The purpose of the
tests was to determine how far pure, unexploded plutonium might be
scattered by accidents involving nuclear bombs. A few safety
experiments were even associated with a slight nuclear yield.

The safety experiments were conducted at five locations on the Nellis Air Force Range (Double Tracks; Clean Slates 1, 2, and 3; and Area 13) and two locations (Area 3 and Area 11) on the Nevada Test Site. (map)
See more maps at the pdf document titled 'Statistical Analysis of Pu in Soil at NTS - Some Results'
Project 57, a 1957 safety test conducted in 'Area 13,' involved a real warhead that was estimated to have released about 250 Curies of Pu239 - the amount a warhead associated with a 1.5 kiloton yield would contain. [One Curie of Pu239 is about 16 grams] (Read more in Chapter 4 of our book - see the table of contents here)
Read more at: The Plutonium Plume That Fell On Utah (May 28, 2008)
The Plutonium Plume That Fell On Utah
By Andrew Kishner
5-28-2008For about two years now, I've been regularly re-reading an article saved on my desktop that is titled 'Atomic "Safety Tests" in 1950s Showered Utah With Plutonium.' It was published by the Washington Post in 1979.
What has bothered me about this article for a long time is that no one ever seems to reference it and, also, that I simply have not been able to understand how it could be true. Most scientists and amateurs, such as myself, know that the fallout from past atomic blasts contained little plutonium since that fission 'trigger' material is usually consumed by the nuclear blast. I also knew about the so-called safety tests of 1957-1958 when the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) conducted plutonium dispersal experiments in and around the Nevada Test Site.
I never believed that when the AEC started blowing up mock or real warheads that the plutonium dust would travel 'that' far into Utah and create 'that' much contamination.
The 1979 Washington Post article states that plutonium was spread across the most densely populated part of Utah - meaning in and around Salt Lake City - in the late 1950s that produced levels of plutonium as much as 3.8 times higher than concentrations elsewhere. What was surprising to those scientists is that the plutonium - the most radiotoxic of all materials - was found in such large quantities. The scientists in Utah attributed it to those safety tests. The same happened with a Nevada graduate student who in the 1990s found plutonium dust in the attics of homes in Las Vegas and other towns in Nevada and Utah that he attributed to the safety tests.
The worst of all the safety tests was 'Project 57,' which contaminated Nevada Test Site's Area 13 with four times more Curies of radioactivity than average at nine other safety test sites. The estimated contamination at Area 13 is 46 Curies - hundreds of acres of soils are contaminated at levels that would provide a fatal dose to humans.
The plume cloud from Project 57 apparently went north-northeast and deposited just over 200 Curies of plutonium over a large area extending towards Ely, Nevada, and into Utah, and possibly Salt Lake City. Since plutonium concentrations greater than 10 picoCuries (10 trillionths of a Curie) per gram are fatal for humans, there are a lot of 'hot' areas at Area 13 and all over Nevada and Utah that contain dangerous levels of plutonium that will remain so for the next 240,000 years. Worse, 99% of the plutonium particulates at Area 13 - and possibly elsewhere - are small enough to be picked up by wind. And worse, Area 13 hasn't been cleaned up and the plutonium there keeps on getting resuspended into other areas that aren't 'protected' by radiation monitoring equipment. The current monitoring network run by the DOE cannot detect alpha or beta radiation (e.g., plutonium 239).
Downwinder activist and playwright Mary Dickson has for a long time tried to call attention to the fact that there are downwinders in northern Utah. Her play 'Exposed' and her many writings testify to the fact that Salt Lake City and its environs were exposed and people have died and are dying from that exposure. It is possible that the lack of data and fallout maps regarding these safety tests has prevented the public from believing these stories and also the link between safety and other atomic tests and radiation-induced illnesses in Northern Utah.
This data, however, isn't forthcoming from the DOE and the DOE's stalled environmental cleanup and incomplete environmental analysis of Area 13 should not go unnoticed. The DOE should complete a new, full-blown EIS for the Nevada Test Site to address these lingering radiation hotspots, the dangers of resuspension and the lack of adequate airborne radiation monitoring in and around downwind communities.
(The information cited above is largely from the following source: 'The American West at Risk' by Howard G. Wilshire, Jane E. Nielson and Richard W. Hazlett pp.395-398)
Prefixes, conversions and equivalents
Tables about atomic elements, decay charts, fission yields
NuclearCrimes.org's sitemap and various public and government documents of interest we uploaded online: 1.
2.
'The
greatest irony of our atmospheric nuclear testing program is that the only
victims of U.S. nuclear arms since World War II have been our own people.'
- Forgotten
Guinea Pigs Report, 1980
| Tips for arguing with radiation PR people | ||
| When they belittle your claims... | by comparing any exposure from their facilities to... | You say or ask... |
| ...about your exposure to fallout from nuke plants or weapons testing fallout... | ....background radiation... | 'Background radiation doesn't mean it is harmless - it
probably does cause a small portion of cancers. If you are adding
to the background radiation, you are adding to someone's risk.'
'How many more defective children will be born and how many cancers will be induced by this increase in 'background radiation'? |
| ...about your exposure to fallout from nuke plants or weapons testing fallout... | ...flying in a airplane... | 'That is not a realistic comparison. Radionuclides in fallout are incorporated into our bodies (tissue, bones). Most of the radiation from cosmic rays is external.' |
| ...about your exposure to fallout from nuke plants or weapons testing fallout... | ... a chest x-ray... | 'You don't ingest or inhale the radiation source from x-rays. An x-ray lasts for a millisecond. Fallout lingers in body tissue and bones for decades .' |
| ...about your exposure to fallout from nuke plants or weapons testing fallout... | ...eating a banana | 'Potassium-40 is a naturally occurring radioisotope that has been present in foods and the environment on Earth for billions of years. Potassium 40, which at normal body levels delivers an annual internal dose to the soft tissue of 20 millirem and 5 millirem to the bone, is not as hazardous as many forms of anthropogenic (meaning: artificial; manmade) radiation for several reasons. One main reason is, unlike many types of manmade fission products, its environmental levels rarely peak to hundreds or thousands of times normal levels. Since 1945, we've seen a cycle of drastic rising and falling of levels of environmental anthropogenic radiation with nuclear accidents, non-accident releases, radioactivity blowing around, etc... Another reason: some forms of anthropogenic radiation in the body do much more damage than potassium-40 for the same quantity of radiation. Dose tables printed in a 1970s document (NUREG 1.109 rev. 1 Oct. '77) by the NRC paint a spooky, yet realistic, picture for what happens to a radiation sensitive organ, the thyroid, when iodine-131 is consumed. A NRC formula indicates that 1,000 picocuries of iodine-131 gives a dose of 80 millirems to the adult thyroid and 140 millirems to the thyroid of an infant. Consider: one liter of 'Sunrise Dairy' (Kansas) milk in April 2011 had 1,518 pCi/L of Iodine-131. That was from Fukushima. |
| ...about your exposure to fallout from nuke plants or weapons testing fallout... | ...standing next to a smoke alarm.... | 'You don't ingest or inhale the Americium-241 from smoke alarms. You're talking about the small gamma component of Am-241. That's external exposure.' |