When it comes to the truth about radiation and health effects, there are no experts who are honest - not in government, not in science, not anywhere. Yet, people would rather listen to liars than challenge their assumptions about the sources of the so-called truth and disregard the purveyors of actual truth on this topic: the non-creditialed self-taught. - Andrew Kishner, May 18, 2013

You are reading from a free online e-book titled 'Deception, Cover-up and Murder in the Nuclear Age.' The book discusses the Trinity test, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, hydrogen bomb testing fallout, U.S. experiments done on Marshall Islanders (Project 4.1), the Irene Allen trial, Cosmos 954, the Fukushima meltdowns, Three Mile Island updates, and so much more. Visit the Table of Contents to find this free content.

Footnotes are located at the end of each chapter - press the (right facing) 'PAGE' button icon until you reach the footnotes page, or locate it via the table of contents

Previous Document Table of Contents Next Document

6 of 7

11-6

Chapter 11 - The 'bad science' behind nuclear reactors

Case study: Millstone  

Located in southeastern Connecticut is the Millstone Power Station, home of three reactors only two of which are now operating.  Unit 1, which was shut down in 1998, has the distinction of having released the highest ever recorded amounts of airborne radioactivity in the history of nuclear energy until the Three Mile Island disaster.  In 1974, the total airborne radioactive releases from all U.S. reactors was about 6.5 million Curies.  Yet, in 1975, Millstone's Unit 1 released about 3 million airborne curies of 'Fission Activation Gases' containing thirteen 'species' of radio-krypton and -xenon gases.  That was half of the national nuclear power total.   It was also about one-quarter of the gaseous release of the 1979 Three Mile Island accident (TMI released at least 13 million Curies of radioactive noble gases similar in nature to those gases released at Millstone).   

The book Nuclear Witnesses tells of the astounding origin, in the words of Dr. Sternglass, behind this grandiose nuclear waste dumping over Connecticut: it originated in the Nixon administration - "All attempts to enforce tighter regulations were turned aside and sabotaged, so that nuclear reactors were able to release the highest amounts of radioactivity ever recorded in the history of nuclear energy in 1974 and 1975 at the Millstone Plant."

Both TMI and Millstone released similar levels of harmful Iodine-131, which accumulates in local food chains and eventually pools into a person's thyroid where cancer may be induced.   In 1975 Millstone released 9.79 Curies of Iodine-131 and 17.2 Curies of Tritium. (About 820,000 of the curies released at Millstone in 1975 consisted of xenon-133, which is a beta-emitter and has a half-life of 5.24 days.)

Millstone Point Unit 1

Airborne releases 

1973

1974

1975

1976

Total noble gases  (Curies)

78,900

912,000

2,970,000

507,000

  

Source: Summary of Radioactivity Released in Effluents from Nuclear Power Plants From 1973 to 1976, December 1977, U.S. EPA-520/3-7-012

Case study: Tokai-mura 

On Sept. 30, 1999, the JCO Company Ltd. uranium-conversion facility in the Japanese town of Tokai-mura experienced a criticality accident.  A 2000 study on the incident noted: "An appreciable amount of 137Cs was found in samples collected near the exhaust (Table 1)....137Cs originating from global fallout already exists in the Japanese environment, with levels of fallout 137Cs in vegetation normally less than 0.14 Bq kg~1 (wet wt) around Tokai-mura (Ibaraki, 1998). Therefore, the 137Cs found in the plant samples collected from the above-mentioned points is thought to be the contamination from the JCO accident. Similarly to 140Ba, 137Cs is a daughter of a noble gas produced in the fission event. The precursor of 137Cs is 137Xe (half-life: 3.82 m). The 137Xe released to the atmosphere decayed to 137Cs which was expected to be deposited on the ground (vegetation) near the exhaust" - Levels of radionuclides in plant samples collected around the uranium conversion facility following the criticality accident in Tokai-mura, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, (50) 2000

Case study: Vermont Yankee

Located in southeastern Vermont on the banks of the Connecticut River (which empties into Long Island Sound in southern Connecticut), 'Vermont Yankee' consists of a single BWR (boiling water reactor) nuclear plant.  The plant began operations in 1972 and has had a long history of problems including spills, leaks, a 2004 transformer fire and a 2007 cooling tower fan cell collapse.  

In January 2010, Entergy found radioactive tritium in an onsite monitoring well near the Connecticut River and initiated a soil excavation project.

On February 12, they discovered a steam leak and standing water in a pipe tunnel leading to an 'Advanced Off-Gas' building.  Later, it was learned that Entergy originally told state legislators  the underground PVC drain pipes didn't exist.

On February 14, Energy said they isolated a steam leak that was causing the tritium contamination in the soils, which were found to contain extremely high levels of the radioactive water molecule. 

On February 24, Entergy say they found public above-normal levels of Cesium-137 detected near the underground pipes at the 15-foot depth.  Officials at Entergy initially claimed the radiocesium was "consistent with what would be found in soil" from weapons testing or Chernobyl fallout.  The Vermont Health Department even perpetuated the loony theory in a March 30th update-analysis on their 'Tritium Investigation Archive' page titled 'Soil Analysis Confirms Leakage Pathway, Finds Cesium-137.'  The Health Department noted that Entergy officials had told them that 'water from the systems that leaked into the AOG pipe tunnel are not contaminated with Cs-137' and the 'reactor process water and condensate have not indicated Cs-137 content for many years.'  Their website states: 'Given these [abovementioned] points, it may be that the Cs-137 found in the soil samples came from surface contamination within the AOG pipe tunnel. This surface contamination may have been washed from the AOG pipe tunnel walls, floor and piping surfaces by the leaking steam and water from the damaged AOG hydrogen recombiner steam trap drain lines.'  

On February 28, the Vermont Health department noted that the crack "represents a significant pathway for radioactive water from the AOG pipe tunnel into the environment in the recent past.'    The Health Department had explained the how and why of the leak: "A pair of steam pipes inside the Advanced Off-Gas (AOG) pipe tunnel were found to be badly corroded and leaking nuclear steam.  The floor drain of this concrete tunnel was clogged with debris and mud. As a result, the condensate from the steam pipes pooled inside the tunnel and leaked out at a failed joint in the tunnel."  See very confusing diagram. (The AOG building is where noncondensable gases are 'processed' or 'held up' and then released into our environment.   In case the pipe leaks, its housing, a concrete tunnel, drains into a pit and a sump-pump pushes the water into a Rad Waste Building for reprocessing.)

In March 2010, the VT Department of Health noted in March 2010 that the leaked tritium has migrated several hundred feet east to the Connecticut River but said that was not the case with other radionuclides.  

On April 3, Entergy reversed their position, admitting the cesium-137 resulted from an unidentified fuel rod failure within the reactor.  

At the beginning of April 2010, cesium concentrations were found up to 10,260 picoCuries per gram, about 60,000 to 100,000 times normal 'background levels.'  (Jeff Hardy, chemistry manager for Entergy Nuclear, told the Rutland Herald that the 'background level of cesium-137 at the Vermont Yankee site' was 0.15 picoCuries per gram.  William Irwin, radiological health chief for the Department of Health, told the Herald that background levels in Vermont for Cesium-137 'from Chernobyl and weapons testing ranged from' 0.1 to 0.15 picocuries per gram.

The actual timeframe of the when the leaked cesium-137 showed up in the underground soil is also unknown.  Some speculated that the cesium-137 leaked during the 1970s or 1980s when Yankee had persistent fuel rod failures. Others speculated it leaked during a nuclear fuel failure episode in 2001-2002 and even others believed the cause was a new leak.

Although Entergy maintains the leakage in the soils is limited to a small confined area, there may be other contaminated areas.  Because precursor gases of cesium-137 and strontium-90 must have leaked out over decades, they probably bubbled up through the porous soil and precipitated down as cesium-137 and strontium-90 on Vermont, Massachusetts and New Hampshire homes, schools, farms and parks.  

Leak Number 1: Leaks from past or current fuel rod failures led to radioactive gases and solids entering the primary water cooling system.  Leak Number 2: a leaky nuclear steam pipe leaked radioactive materials into the drain pipe.  Leak Number 3: the PVC pipe had a leak that drained into the concrete tunnel.  Leak Number 4: the water in tunnel pooled because of a clog and leaked out of a crack in the concrete duct (tunnel) into the soil.


Previous Document Top of Document Table of Contents Next Document

   

 About Us | Contact | Donate | Prefixes & equivalents, radiation conversions | One-stop atomic elements references | Japan Finds Radioactivity in More Foods From California: The California Radiation Report  | Map of eastern U.S. reactors | link to us

Popular pages: Updates (Fukushima and Pacific coast n' catch) | Subcritical nuclear test news | Downwinder Day | Trinity nuclear test | Contaminated wallboard/phosphogypsum | Caged human experiments at nuclear test sites

Important pages: Gummed film & fallout maps | Scientists misled Americans about 'hot' halibut | Fukushima formed a 'hotspot' in California | EPA is not exactly 'monitoring' our milk for radiation | Montana cows died from radiation? | FDA is barely testing our food for radiation | spent fuel fires could harm us all | a NUCLEAR REACTOR from SPACE could land on your house | solar storm dangers | plutonium dust is a problem north of Vegas | Chernobyl contamination was 95% from Chernobyl; 5% Was From a U.S. Secret Radiation Release | Nuclear Reactor Operators Don't Really Monitor Their Pollution - They Guess

Believe it or not: U.S. Government Gave Secret Fallout Maps to Kodak, But Never to Americans | Unexploded Nuclear Bombs North of Las Vegas Could Still Detonate or Reach Criticality| Your Cremated Remains Would be 180 Times the Limit Allowable by the EPA for Beta Radiation in Drinking Water | Quaker Oats and Boston universities gave radioactive cereal to unwitting special needs children

How does strontium-90 escape from reactors? As krypton-90 gas. Verify it with this 'decay chain' widget. What happens when xenon-137 gas leaves reactors?

Public documents of interest we uploaded online onto two Scribd.com accounts: 1. Documents 2. Documents

Nuclearcrimes.org has hundreds of citations (footnotes) that can usually be found at the bottom of each webpage or the end of each book chapter.